Skip to content
Insights

The magic formula for calculating the “best schedule”

Finding a balance between maximizing revenue and meeting customer needs is the core challenge of airline schedule building and availability calculation. It’s tough for airlines and distribution partners, yet metasearch seems to get it right. What is their “magic formula” and what can airlines learn from these digital-first retailers?

Traditionally, the order in which flight options are presented to a customer is determined via a ranking model. The model gives a weight to a series of factors, usually trip length and price, to score a schedule. The system then returns the results to the customer based on that ranking. But this method doesn’t always give customers the “best schedule”, that is, the fare they are most likely to buy.

On the other hand, machine learning-based systems, such as those used by metasearch, consider passenger and trip characteristics such as trip length, stops, featured flight, and rewards to determine booking probability. In fact, they can include as many features as they like when setting up the model.

Which way works the best? The traditional model or the ML-based one? Our data science team put both approaches to the test.

In traditional schedule building, the response API does not return the “best schedule” for the customer in the first search, preventing the airline from maximizing the booking probability and hence, revenue. The most convenient (“best”) schedule is often among the lower-ranked options, obscured by other options such as the cheapest.

Illustration: ML-based vs. traditional schedule building (data from a leading carrier in the Americas)

The above image shows that the ML-based model ranked the schedule the customer purchased third. However, the traditional legacy model would have displayed it in the 16th position. Such a low ranking would probably have led to the passenger not booking the optimal schedule or booking with a different provider.

Our experiments show that our ML-based model has a 91% prediction success rate compared to 86% with the traditional model. For airlines flying 20 million passengers per year, that 5% difference could significantly increase revenue. Might it be the magic formula?

At Accelya, our data science team works to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our solutions to ensure our airline customers benefit from advances enjoyed by digital-first players, such as metasearch. Curious to learn more? Connect with us today.

Latest insights

You might also be interested in

News

Accelya announced that ambitious Egyptian carrier Air Cairo has become the first North African airline to benefit from its market-leading revenue management solution.

READ

News

Accelya announces partnership with Aeromexico to help them improve control of their sales channel via our FLX Passenger Platform.

READ

Insights

Technological changes typically bring opportunities for airlines. Maximizing those opportunities requires that every team that will be impacted by the change is involved from the start.

Bringing the finance team out from “behind the scenes” in the planning and integration phase could be the key to unlocking the high-performance retailing potential of ONE Order, writes Muffi Lokhandwala, Business Development for Financial Solutions at Accelya.

READ

Insights

Two new hosts have joined us on Airline Voice Radio. Industry pioneers and great storytellers: Nancy Delgado and Tye Radcliffe. Nancy and Tye are here to get some fresh perspectives on high-performance retailing from airline thought leaders.

In this episode, Tye sits down with Justin Jovignot, TAP Air Portugal’s Director of Commercial Strategy and Distribution.

READ
subscribe